Knowledge, Cause, and Abstract Objects: Causal Objections to Platonism

Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online Knowledge, Cause, and Abstract Objects: Causal Objections to Platonism file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with Knowledge, Cause, and Abstract Objects: Causal Objections to Platonism book. Happy reading Knowledge, Cause, and Abstract Objects: Causal Objections to Platonism Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF Knowledge, Cause, and Abstract Objects: Causal Objections to Platonism at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF Knowledge, Cause, and Abstract Objects: Causal Objections to Platonism Pocket Guide.

Sign In or Create an Account. Sign In. Advanced Search. Article Navigation. Close mobile search navigation Article Navigation. Volume Oxford Academic. Google Scholar. Cite Citation. Permissions Icon Permissions.

Article PDF first page preview. Issue Section:. But I don't think it succeeds.

Knowledge, Cause, and Abstract Objects Causal Objections to Platonism

Why must an acceptable theory of modality be more fundamental than omnipotence? What reasons are there for preferring theistic conceptualism over Platonism? No doubt it would be the task of the theistic conceptualist to meet contemporary defenses of platonism.

How Do You Distinguish Between Concrete and Abstract Objects?

But in fact I think this can and has been done. This is to say nothing of what other reasons we might have for preferring conceptualism over Platonism. So again it seems to me that you have not done much against the argument for God from abstract objects. As a side note, I really apologize if I came off as snarky! I really enjoyed your post and appreciated your response equally as much!


  • Colin Cheyne, Knowledge, Cause, and Abstract Objects Causal Objections to Platonism - PhilPapers.
  • Duke Ellington for Jazz Guitar (Hal Leonard Jazz Play Along).
  • Clinical Problems in Sexually Transmitted Diseases!

He argues that Bergmann and Brower's argument doesn't refute theistic activism. Hi Wissam, Thanks for the pointer. I'll have to give it a close read, but I'm antecedently inclined to think that theism is compatible with platonism.

BEST PDF Knowledge, Cause, and Abstract Objects: Causal Objections to Platonism (The Western

My own concern is not primarily with compatibility. It is rather with whether theism is good or even decent evidence for theism. I'm still inclined to think it isn't. I myself lean toward platonism about propositions, properties, possible worlds, and the like. I think they're eternal, uncreated, existentially independent, necessarily existent beings that God if a god should exist did not create. Tacking God on to explain the data related to abstracta seems to needlessly complicate one's ontology, or so it seems to me.

Best, EA. I'm actually inclined to believe that platonism poses a problem for theism to some extent, given what I read about the subject esp.

You have also argued that in this post. Did you change your mind on the matter? I haven't read the alternative theories theists provide to reconcile abstracta with God, but I think they provide some sort of conceptualism. Hello, exapologist As Chad pointed above, it is difficult for the naturalist to account for the existence of abstract objects just by appealing to metaphysical necessity.

A metaphisically necessary being is still in need for an explanation. Thomists would argue that God is a metaphysically necessary being, and they defined God as a being whose essence is existence, which therefore explains why God exists. As I recall from reading your blog, you defend a version of the PSR that the naturalist might safely agree with. That being said, I still don't know how a naturalist can avoid a materialist world at all.

Hi Luis, There is a standard explanation amongst philosophers that I find persuasive: Just as in theoretical physics, we posit theoretical entities and attribute the relevant features to them when they are needed to explain the relevant data. Abstract objects are posited to explain a wide range of data, and they are posited to have necessary existence to do this adequately.

So, for example, mathematical truths are true in all possible worlds, and thus we posit the mathematical facts that make them true to exist in all possible worlds. Therefore, if conceivability is prima facie evidence of possibility, then we have a positive reason to doubt that it's possible for God to ground the necessity of mathematical truths. Post a Comment. In a previous post , I pointed out that there are over four dozen arguments for atheism.

Revision history. This entry has no external links. Add one. Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server Configure custom proxy use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy. Configure custom resolver.

Log in to Wiley Online Library

Epistemological Objections to Platonism. David Liggins - - Philosophy Compass 5 1 Towards a Fictionalist Philosophy of Mathematics.

Featured channels

Robert Knowles - unknown. Michael Liston - - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 2 — Necessary Existence and A Priori Knowledge. Colin Cheyne - unknown. The Conceivability of Platonism.

auto-class23.ru/includes/cyl-generisch-plaquenil.php

Read Knowledge, Cause, and Abstract Objects: Causal Objections to Pla…

Benjamin Callard - - Philosophia Mathematica 15 3 What is Causation? Stathos Psillos - unknown. Stathis Psillos - unknown.